Skip to main content
Hussain & Gutierrez

Immigration Law · Van Nuys

Adjustment of Status Under INA 245(i)

Understand the issue, the records that may matter, and the next step to discuss with the firm.

Walk-ins welcome
Van Nuys office6316 Van Nuys Boulevard, Van Nuys, CA 91401
Language supportAttorney: Hindi, Sinhalese, Tamil, Urdu · Spanish spoken by staff

On this page

The Useful Question Is “Am I Grandfathered?”

Many 245(i) cases start with a memory rather than a file: a parent says an employer filed something in the 1990s, a spouse remembers an old I-130, or the family has one faded receipt notice but not the underlying petition. That history can be legally important. It can also be misunderstood.

Section 245(i) does not create a new immigrant category. It can allow certain grandfathered people to apply for adjustment of status in the United States even though particular entry or status problems would otherwise trigger adjustment bars. The historic filing is the grandfathering hook; a current family-, employment-, or other qualifying immigrant basis is still needed.

A Four-Gate 245(i) Review

  1. Historic filing: Identify the immigrant petition or labor-certification application filed on or before April 30, 2001, and obtain the best available proof that it was properly filed and approvable when filed.
  2. Physical presence when required: If the qualifying filing was made after Jan. 14, 1998, determine whether the person who must satisfy the statute can prove physical presence in the United States on Dec. 21, 2000.
  3. Current immigrant basis and visa availability: Grandfathering does not itself provide a green card. The person still needs a current basis and, for preference categories, a visa number must be available at the relevant stage.
  4. Admissibility and other eligibility: 245(i) does not waive every inadmissibility ground. Prior departures, unlawful presence, fraud/misrepresentation, removal history, criminal issues, and other facts must be reviewed separately.

Which Old Documents Can Change the Analysis?

  • old I-130, I-140, or related receipt/approval/denial notices;
  • labor-certification filing receipts, employer correspondence, attorney correspondence, or Department of Labor records;
  • copies of the original petition/application and supporting documents, even if the filing was later withdrawn, denied, revoked, or the relationship/employment changed;
  • marriage and birth records showing a spouse/child relationship to a principal beneficiary where derivative grandfathering may be relevant;
  • evidence of physical presence on Dec. 21, 2000 when that requirement applies—such as dated school, medical, employment, banking, rent, utility, tax, government, or other reliable records;
  • complete immigration history: entries, exits, border encounters, prior applications, notices to appear, removal orders, and any use of false documents or information.

Do not discard an old filing because the petition failed years later. USCIS rules distinguish whether a filing was “approvable when filed” from what happened because of later circumstances. That distinction is one reason a historical file review is more useful than relying on memory alone.

What 245(i) Does Not Fix

DO NOT ASSUME Being grandfathered does not automatically cure unlawful-presence inadmissibility after a departure, a prior removal problem, fraud or misrepresentation, criminal inadmissibility, a false claim to U.S. citizenship, or every other immigration issue. Some problems may have a separate waiver; some may not. The sequence of entries and departures can be as important as the old filing itself.

The safest review separates two questions: “Does 245(i) protect the ability to adjust despite a 245(a)/(c) problem?” and “Is the person otherwise eligible and admissible for the immigrant benefit?” Those are not the same question.

If the Old Petitioner or Employer Is Gone

Grandfathering and the current immigration basis can be different. A person may be grandfathered through one historic petition or labor certification but later adjust through a different qualifying petition if all current requirements are met. That does not mean every old filing works; it means the historical and current files should be analyzed separately instead of assuming the original petitioner must still be the path to residence.

Questions to Bring to a 245(i) Consultation

  • Who filed for whom, and what was the filing date?
  • Was it a family petition, employment petition, or labor-certification application?
  • Do you have a receipt number, approval/denial, old attorney name, employer name, or copy of the filing?
  • If the filing was after Jan. 14, 1998, what records can prove physical presence on Dec. 21, 2000?
  • What current family or employment basis might support permanent residence now?
  • What are every entry, exit, deportation/removal event, border encounter, arrest, and prior immigration filing in the person’s history?

Talk With Hussain & Gutierrez About a Historical 245(i) Filing

A 245(i) consultation should begin with the paper trail, not a promise. Bring every old immigration notice and enough history to reconstruct who filed, when it was filed, what happened afterward, and what current immigrant basis exists today. Call 888-997-3701 or request a free consultation.

Related immigration guidance

Authoritative sources

Legal disclaimer: This page provides general information about U.S. immigration law and procedure and is not legal advice. Immigration eligibility, discretion, filing posture, travel risk, fees, and agency procedures can change and can depend on a person’s full history. Reading the page or contacting the firm does not create an attorney-client relationship unless an agreement is reached.

Free consultationRequest a consultationCall now888-997-3701